Politics / October 25, 2024

Elon Musk Is Committing a Crime—but It Doesn’t Matter Because He’s Rich

Musk and his PAC are effectively paying people in swing states to register to vote, and that is a clear violation of federal law.

Elie Mystal

Elon Musk awarded Kristine Fishell with a $1 million check during the town hall at the Roxain Theater on October 20, 2024, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.


(Michael Swensen / Getty Images)

Elon Musk is—effectively—paying people to register to vote. This is a violation of federal election laws, and he should be prosecuted, fined, and imprisoned for his numerous violations. Unfortunately, this is Elon Musk we’re talking about, and the person responsible for enforcing federal laws against him is Attorney General Merrick Garland—and all of that means that Musk will not be prosecuted, fined, or sent to prison. The rules, you see, are different for rich white Republicans who violate the laws than they are for anyone else. I thought everybody knew that by now.

What Musk is doing is not complicated, but there’s enough misdirection in his scheme that it can be confusing to see what he’s up to. So allow me to explain. Through his political action committee, Musk is offering $1,000,000, lottery style, to people in “battleground” states—specifically, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, and North Carolina—who sign his PAC’s petition. The petition is a general pledge to “support” the First and Second Amendment (because of course a white South African whose family benefited from apartheid is somewhat more interested in supporting the Second Amendment than, say, the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which prevent people like Musk from doing here what people like Musk did in South Africa). If you sign the petition, you have a chance of winning a million bucks. Musk handed out the first check last weekend.

Paying people, or offering people a lottery ticket, to sign a petition is legal. That’s fine. It’s an exercise of free speech, at least in this ridiculous country that equates money with speech.

The problem with Musk’s scheme is that, in order to get the money, you have to be registered to vote. By making voter registration key to getting the money, Musk is trying to induce people who are not registered to register to vote. That is illegal. As the elections law expert Rick Hasen points out, paying people, bribing people, or giving people pretty much anything of monetary value to induce them to register to vote is a violation of federal law.

For those playing along at home, the law Hasen points to is 52 U.S.C. 10307(c), which states: “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” (Emphasis Hasen’s.)

The Department of Justice has clarified that this law does not apply to, say, giving voters a ride to the polls. But it does include giving people cash, or liquor, or food stamps, or… “lottery chances” to induce them to register.

Musk is violating the law, but for that to matter somebody has to prosecute him for his violations, and that job, unfortunately, rests with Merrick Garland. Garland sent Musk and his PAC a letter earlier this week in which he “warned” that they “could” be violating federal law. Garland is reportedly monitoring and investigating the situation. Musk ignored the warning and announced more winners.

I know there are still people who would like to defend Garland’s historic inability to enforce any laws against Republican political actors, but, honestly, Garland’s response is beyond pathetic. It takes a Google search and half an hour of Westlaw access to “investigate” whether “Hoo boy, register to vote and have a chance to win a million dollars” violates applicable federal standards. The Department of Justice’s own “Election Crimes Manual” explains that what Musk is doing is illegal. Garland need only “investigate” the rules written down by his own institution to figure out that Musk is in violation of the law.

The strongly worded letter Garland sent to Musk should have been a legal complaint, filed in court, and served to Musk while he was on stage handing out the freaking check.

But while Garland continues to be a national embarrassment, incapable of doing anything that might anger the Republican base, the sad reality is that even bringing the full force of the law against Musk would not stop his illegal actions. That’s because the full force of the law is incredibly weak in this instance and of little consequence to a rich white man.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Astute readers will have noticed that the penalty for violating the law at issue is a fine of “not more than $10,000” or imprisonment of “not more than five years, or both.” Musk is not going to go to jail because of this. We don’t put white people in jail for violating federal election laws, especially not when they are first-time offenders and the violation is as technical as this one is. (People, white people mainly, are going to object to my pointing out that Musk’s race is helping him get away with this, but please, how quickly do you think Oprah would find her ass in jail if she went to Houston and offered $1,000,000 to anybody who registered to vote and signed her petition saying “I support Black women”?) Also: Violations of this nature are always, or almost always (see the above Oprah thought experiment) addressed with a fine, in the first instance.

That fine should be $10,000. For Elon Musk. I’d say the fine is loose change for him, but the actual change you have rattling around in your pockets and hidden in your couch cushions is probably a greater percentage of your net worth than $10,000 is to Elon Musk’s billions. Even if you fined him $10,000 for every violation—that is, $10,000 for every voter who registered for a chance to win his lotto—the fine would not deter his behavior one bit.

And so, Elon Musk is paying Republicans to register to vote in battleground states, and there’s nothing we can really do to stop him.

With that brute reality in mind, my actual advice is that Democrats in battleground states should also register to vote and sign Musk’s petition. Maybe you will win the $1,000,000 bucks. Then you can get up on stage, get your check, and rip open your shirt to show that you were a Harris voter all along. Everybody should have a chance to punk Elon Musk.

Elie Mystal

Elie Mystal is The Nation’s justice correspondent and the host of its legal podcast, Contempt of Court. He is also an Alfred Knobler Fellow at the Type Media Center. His first book is the New York Times bestseller Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution, published by The New Press. Elie can be followed @ElieNYC.

More from The Nation

Nutcracker

Nutcracker Nutcracker

Christmas wrath.

OppArt / Kevin Kallaugher

Former Oklahoma senator Fred Harris stands outside his Corrales, New Mexico, home, Friday, July 23, 2004.

Remembering Fred Harris Remembering Fred Harris

1930–2024

Jim Hightower

Enough With the Bad Election Takes!

Enough With the Bad Election Takes! Enough With the Bad Election Takes!

To properly diagnose what went wrong, we need to look at the actual number of votes cast.

Steve Phillips

No, They Couldn’t: In a recent appearance on Pod Save America the consultants who steered the Kamala Harris campaign to defeat still refused to accept any responsibility—or to criticize the candidate.

No, Kamala Harris Staffers Did Not Run a “Flawless” Campaign No, Kamala Harris Staffers Did Not Run a “Flawless” Campaign

Democratic strategists are still patting themselves on the back for a catastrophic defeat.

Jeet Heer

Donald Trump in court for his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments at Manhattan Criminal Court on April 23, 2024, in New York City.

The Courts, Trump, and Us: A Q&A With David Cole The Courts, Trump, and Us: A Q&A With David Cole

Last time, the courts were an essential checking force on the Trump administration. This time around, they may again provide a check—if we push.

Q&A / Jon Wiener

Congresswoman Barbara Lee on Why Shirley Chisholm Was Right

Congresswoman Barbara Lee on Why Shirley Chisholm Was Right Congresswoman Barbara Lee on Why Shirley Chisholm Was Right

The California Democrat explains why, during her 25 years in Congress, it was important for her “to disrupt and dismantle and build something that’s equitable and just and right.”...

Q&A / John Nichols