Politics / StudentNation / March 14, 2025

Inside Trump’s Decimation of the Department of Education

Current and former employees at the agency spoke with The Nation about the chaos as 1,300 people were laid off on Tuesday. “The ramifications of this will be enormous.”

Owen Dahlkamp

Donald Trump speaks at a press conference with Linda McMahon in 2019.


(Nicholas Kamm / Getty)

On March 11, the Trump administration announced a cut to nearly half of the Department of Education’s 4,000-person workforce—signaling the beginning of the president’s longtime campaign promise of shuttering the department.

Internal changes have been ongoing for weeks. Current and former employees at the agency spoke with The Nation about the chaos inside the department as the administration released layoff notifications and aligned the department with President Trump’s political agenda. The Department of Education did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Employees were notified on Tuesday that the department’s offices would be closed starting at 6 pm due to “security reasons,” per a copy of an e-mail obtained by The Nation. Confusion and rumors began to swirl about potential shake-ups, according to an employee who was laid off and granted anonymity for fear of losing their severance benefits. “We were all trying to figure out ‘What’s the security concern?,’” they said.

Fifteen minutes after the offices closed, the department announced the layoffs. But employees were not initially told whether they were one of the approximately 1,300 who were fired. Employees called and texted one another in an attempt to learn if they still had a job. Those fired did not receive an e-mail notifying them of their termination until 7:30 pm—over an hour after it was announced to the public.

The termination e-mail, obtained by The Nation, says the decision was a result of Trump’s executive order establishing the so-called Department of Government Efficiency and a memo from the Office of Personnel Management advising workforce cuts. “This decision is in no way a reflection of your performance or contributions,” the e-mail reads. But one employee said that rhetoric from the administration about “bureaucratic bloat,” including Secretary of Education Linda McMahon’s comments Tuesday on Fox News, has made federal employees ask: “Why would anyone want to hire me after this if there’s been messaging that we’re not good people?”

McMahon hinted at the move in a department-wide e-mail to staff sent last week titled “Our Department’s Final Mission.” Criticizing DEI programs, federal bureaucracy, and alleged anti-American ideology in schools, she wrote that “we will partner with Congress and other federal agencies to determine the best path forward to fulfill the expectations of the president and the American people.”

Current Issue

Cover of April 2025 Issue

McMahon has acknowledged that fully shutting down the agency, which was created by statute in 1979, would require an act of Congress. But the expansive nature of the layoffs effectively paralyzes the department, according to a former employee. “By the time there is an act of Congress, there isn’t going to be anything left anyway.”

“The ramifications of this will be enormous,” according to one employee, who said that the political upheaval from these firings is only just beginning. “We’re going to see a societal shift on education.” The department vowed that the eliminations will not impact the agency’s statutory functions, such as Pell Grants, funding for students with disabilities, and student loans. An employee pushed back on this, saying, “It’s impossible for statutory functions to occur without the necessary people in place to provide oversight and make sure they are implemented appropriately and in a timely manner.”

“We were already understaffed and trying to do our best,” they said. “This gutting of the agency will harm millions of people and interrupt services and activities across America.”

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

A coalition of 20 state attorneys general, led by New York Attorney General Leticia James, filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Trump administration over the department’s Tuesday firings. In a press release, James called the move “madness,” arguing that “this administration may claim to be stopping waste and fraud, but it is clear that their only mission is to take away the necessary services, resources, and funding that students and their families need.”

The administration’s crusade began well before Tuesday’s layoffs. In a February 5 e-mail, employees were directed to ensure compliance with some of Trump’s DEI- and gender-related orders. They included a list of keywords they say were unacceptable, including “fairness,” “access,” “empathy,” “homosexual,” “equity,” gender,” “LGBTQ,” “social justice,” and more.

Employees removed letters “supporting LGBTQI+ youth and families in school,” “supporting intersex students,” “supporting transgender youth,” and a resource guide for “confronting anti-LGBTQ+ harassment in schools” from the department’s website, according to a partial list of removals obtained by The Nation.

That same day, employees were sent an e-mail requiring them to review all new and ongoing grants to ensure “department grants do not fund discriminatory practices—including in the form of D.E.I.” In a team meeting to discuss the new orders, employees planned to begin a review of all Education Department grants that contain these keywords. The department began cutting millions of dollars in grants later that month they claim contained DEI.

In January, the department also stopped the development of Spanish translations for trainings that are provided to agency personnel and grant awardees, according to an employee and an internal e-mail. An e-mail sent last week, and reviewed by The Nation, said that the department was considering fully removing all Spanish trainings from its website.

Before Tuesday’s layoffs, some employees in the department received buyout offers of up to $25,000, per an internal e-mail. The employees were also sent the “Fork in the Road” e-mail in late January, offering a deferred resignation. Other probationary employees were also terminated. Dozens of employees associated with DEI initiatives in the department were also placed on administrative leave, according to an e-mail obtained by The Nation.

Sheria Smith, the president of the union that represents thousands of Education Department employees, said at the time that “our members want to continue their important work for the public and are frustrated that their work has been disrupted.”

These shake-ups have left employees feeling scared and uneasy, as they only learn about the termination through news reports. “Sometimes I’ll e-mail someone and just get an automated response that they are on administrative leave,” they said, “and I had no clue they were put on leave.”

McMahon said that nearly 600 employees voluntarily resigned or retired over the past seven weeks. Tuesday’s layoffs cut about 1,300 additional workers. Similar layoffs have been seen at other agencies in recent weeks, including at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the US Agency for International Development.

Plans for the agency’s elimination have not been a secret. Campaigning a third time for the presidency, Trump vowed to eliminate the department and dismantle the federal government’s role in education while simultaneously hoping to assume a more intensive ideological regulatory role. In his eye, doing so would combat an education system “taken over by the radical left maniacs.”

Even with the vow to dismantle the department, Trump and his inner circle have been brandishing the Education Department’s main enforcement mechanisms—federal funding and investigations—as a punishment for those they view as not conforming to their executive authority.

The Education Department, in conjunction with other federal agencies, has opened investigations and sent warning letters to schools they believe are not doing enough to protect Jewish students amid pro-Palestinian protests on campus. Last Friday, the administration canceled $400 million in federal funds to Columbia University “due to the school’s continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.”

Rumors of an executive action to substantially dismantle the department have been swirling in Washington for weeks. In an interview on Fox News last Friday, McMahon said that Trump “certainly intends” to sign an executive order that would remake the department and ensure that “education is back at the state level where it belongs.”

On February 4 in the Oval Office, Trump said his administration would “have to work with the teachers’ union” to eliminate the department “because the teachers’ union is the only one that’s opposed to it.” Becky Pringle, president of the largest US teachers’ union, the National Education Association, previously denounced the potential executive action, calling it a “wrecking ball at public schools.”

“We won’t be silent as anti-public education politicians try to steal opportunities from our students, our families, and our communities to finance tax cuts for billionaires,” she said. “Together with parents and allies, we will continue to organize, advocate, and mobilize so that all students have well-resourced schools.”

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Owen Dahlkamp

Owen Dahlkamp is a 2024 Puffin student writing fellow for The Nation. He is a journalist at Brown University, where he is pursuing a degree in political science and cognitive neuroscience.

More from The Nation

Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) speaks with reporters gathered outside Mercado Central on August 11, 2020, in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Ilhan Omar’s American Dream Is Strong Enough for These Times Ilhan Omar’s American Dream Is Strong Enough for These Times

Thirty years after she came to the US, the Minnesota representative keeps the faith in an America that will ultimately reject the divisive politics of Trump and his minions.

John Nichols

Denying Reality as We Burn

Denying Reality as We Burn Denying Reality as We Burn

Check out all installments in the OppArt series.

Ward Sutton

Jeff Bezos, founder and executive chairman of Amazon and owner of The Washington Post, speaks during the New York Times’s annual DealBook summit at Jazz at Lincoln Center on December 4, 2024, in New York City.

Can the Free Press Be Saved? Can the Free Press Be Saved?

It will take a new movement of responsible readers and benefactors to protect independent media.

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Is Political Violence Ever Acceptable?

Is Political Violence Ever Acceptable? Is Political Violence Ever Acceptable?

Natasha Lennard argues that it’s harmful to acquiesce to the state’s determinations of violence, while David Cortright writes that violent acts prevent mass resistance movements.

The Debate / Natasha Lennard and David Cortright

President Donald Trump, accompanied by White House senior adviser and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, speaks next to a Tesla Model S on the South Lawn of the White House on March 11, 2025.

The Corruption Being Obscured by Trump’s Tesla Spectacle The Corruption Being Obscured by Trump’s Tesla Spectacle

Despite how it appeared, Trump wasn’t acting like a used-car salesman for Teslas out of the goodness of his heart.

Sasha Abramsky

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) leaves the Democratic caucus lunch at the US Capitol on March 13, 2025, in Washington, DC.

When Will the Senate Democrats Ever Learn? When Will the Senate Democrats Ever Learn?

Leader Chuck Schumer has thrown up his hands and said he will oppose a GOP-triggered government shutdown. That means he’s supporting the GOP’s cruel government paralysis.

Joan Walsh