Julia Ioffe is a reporter I respect. I don’t always agree with her, but she’s smart, and she actually reports things. Those two characteristics don’t come together in many mainstream national writers.
Apparently, she’s broken out to create a new media empire. She’s begun a newsletter, as people these days do, and it’s called “Tomorrow Will Be Worse,” with a half-consumed martini in its logo. (Yes, tomorrow will be worse if you keep drinking martinis tonight. But I digress.)
She writes: “As veteran subscribers already know, and as new subscribers are finding out, TWBW is but the seed of a new media company my colleagues and I are building, one that will bring you the inside conversation from the four corners of American power: Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington, D.C. ”
I can’t think of anything the country needs less than the allegedly inside conversations from the alleged “four corners of American power.” But Ioffe made a splash on Friday with a piece comparing what it’s like for big-name reporters—and she uses their big first names, to prove her integrity, that she is friends with them, and that this is an inside conversation—to cover the Biden White House after covering Donald Trump. And they don’t seem to like it!
They don’t like it for a lot of reasons, but the main one is: After four years of being able to chase the rats leaving a sinking ship, as well as the rats holed up in their offices trashing Trump on background, the Biden White House is… disciplined. There’s a communications strategy and structure. They’re a team. Apparently, there are no rats!
As a reporter myself, I get why that sucks. I’ve experienced it, to some degree. I try to reach people I know in the administration—and they direct me through the proper channels. It doesn’t work with my deadlines. It definitely doesn’t deliver me scoops. I do have an off-the-record conversation scheduled with a top Biden economic policy adviser… next month.
As an American who wants our country to just basically work again, though, I’m impressed. This is the way it should go, and often has. (People will leak eventually. Look at the coverage of Vice President Kamala Harris. But that’s a story for another time.) I had zero Trump administration sources, since I couldn’t ever bring myself to reach out to my then–CNN green room colleagues Jason “Gettr” Miller, Steve Cortes, or Marc Short, so I can’t compare. Either way, I have plenty to write about. I’ll survive.
But this is the paragraph of Ioffe’s report that went viral on Friday, that I found so triggering. In this example, and a few others, Ioffe, as she admits, lets some reporters stay off the record:
“Democrats in general have a much thinner skin,” observed the prominent White House reporter. “This is not unique to Trump but Republicans never expect a fair shake, so if you cover them fairly, you can have a good working relationship with them. Democrats de facto expect you to be on their side and are horrified when you hold them to account as you would any other administration. It goes back to the Obama years. [Obama staffers would be] like, ‘Don’t you realize that being a woman is no longer a pre-existing condition?!’ And I would be like, ‘Yes, but I’m writing about why your website keeps crashing.’”
How do you write that paragraph without then saying: “And then I realized, we kind of got that story backward, in the end”?
Because I was there, and I saw it. In October 2013, the glitchy Affordable Care Act website was the top political story in the land. I was the weirdo who kept saying: The website will be fixed. Health care is the point. Also: Ted Cruz and the GOP had just shut down the government for more than a month, disastrously—why are you people no longer paying attention to that?
With a hostile incoming administration, a massive infrastructure of courts and judges waiting to turn “freedom of speech” into a nostalgic memory, and legacy newsrooms rapidly abandoning their responsibility to produce accurate, fact-based reporting, independent media has its work cut out for itself.
At The Nation, we’re steeling ourselves for an uphill battle as we fight to uphold truth, transparency, and intellectual freedom—and we can’t do it alone.
This month, every gift The Nation receives through December 31 will be doubled, up to $75,000. If we hit the full match, we start 2025 with $150,000 in the bank to fund political commentary and analysis, deep-diving reporting, incisive media criticism, and the team that makes it all possible.
As other news organizations muffle their dissent or soften their approach, The Nation remains dedicated to speaking truth to power, engaging in patriotic dissent, and empowering our readers to fight for justice and equality. As an independent publication, we’re not beholden to stakeholders, corporate investors, or government influence. Our allegiance is to facts and transparency, to honoring our abolitionist roots, to the principles of justice and equality—and to you, our readers.
In the weeks and months ahead, the work of free and independent journalists will matter more than ever before. People will need access to accurate reporting, critical analysis, and deepened understanding of the issues they care about, from climate change and immigration to reproductive justice and political authoritarianism.
By standing with The Nation now, you’re investing not just in independent journalism grounded in truth, but also in the possibilities that truth will create.
The possibility of a galvanized public. Of a more just society. Of meaningful change, and a more radical, liberated tomorrow.
In solidarity and in action,
The Editors, The Nation
I even got to debate Ezra Klein, a major purveyor of the “the ACA’s shitty website will doom it, and liberalism along with it!” on Chris Hayes’s MSNBC show. I have to say, I think Chris (yes, he’s my friend) sided with Klein but kindly wanted to let me explain my seemingly anti-truth, liberal agitprop point of view.
That was eight years ago, but when I saw that Ioffe quote go viral, I got sick. Do you all really not know what you did—and what you’re still doing?
No, they mostly don’t. “Tomorrow Will Be Worse” might be a new media empire, but it will also probably be true, because journalists still don’t realize what they did to bring us Trump—and they still miss him. That will ensure that tomorrow will be worse.
Joan WalshTwitterJoan Walsh, a national affairs correspondent for The Nation, is a coproducer of The Sit-In: Harry Belafonte Hosts The Tonight Show and the author of What’s the Matter With White People? Finding Our Way in the Next America. Her new book (with Nick Hanauer and Donald Cohen) is Corporate Bullsh*t: Exposing the Lies and Half-Truths That Protect Profit, Power and Wealth In America.