The American Media’s Approach to War Coverage Needs to Be Fundamentally Reimagined

The American Media’s Approach to War Coverage Needs to Be Fundamentally Reimagined

The American Media’s Approach to War Coverage Needs to Be Fundamentally Reimagined

We need more reporting on forgotten conflicts—and more stories that spotlight how war ravages people and leads to atrocities.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

EDITOR’S NOTE: Each week we cross-post an excerpt from Katrina vanden Heuvel’s column at the WashingtonPost.com. Read the full text of Katrina’s column here.

The American media’s approach to war coverage needs to be fundamentally reimagined. We need more reporting on forgotten conflicts—and more stories that spotlight how war ravages people and leads to atrocities.

Last month, the big three US television networks spent as much or more time covering Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as any other conflict during any month of the past three decades—including the United States’ 2003 invasion of Iraq. The war in Ukraine is receiving the attention it deserves, but we have seen troublingly little coverage of raging conflicts in other parts of the world. Yemen’s civil war, for example, received 92 minutes of coverage on the three broadcast networks from 2015 through 2019—compared with the 562 minutes of coverage Ukraine received in March 2022 alone. The Tigray War in Ethiopia receives only occasional mentions on any channel—even though researchers estimate the conflict has killed as many as 500,000 people and displaced 2 million more in less than two years. And in June 2021, just two months before Afghanistan fell to the Taliban, major cable networks spent only 13 minutes reporting on what one historian called “the least reported war since World War I.” (That is, until it came time for cable news to decry the United States’ long-overdue withdrawal.)

Read the full text of Katrina’s column here.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x