The Fierce, Enduring Legacy of America’s Anti–Afghanistan War Protests

The Fierce, Enduring Legacy of America’s Anti–Afghanistan War Protests

The Fierce, Enduring Legacy of America’s Anti–Afghanistan War Protests

These photos from 20 years ago remind us that resistance to the war began even before the war itself.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

After 20 years of US imperial intervention, Afghanistan is a deeply war-wounded country, its cities in ruins and hundreds of thousands of its people in graves. It didn’t have to end this way.

In those dark days after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, a majority of Americans did support military intervention in Afghanistan. But there was also widespread grassroots resistance. From the first cries for war, tens of thousands of people went into the streets in cities across this country to call for it to stop even before it began. The fact that these pleas for peace and sanity ultimately went unheard does not mean that they should be forgotten—we must learn from them, and hopefully chart a more peaceful future for our country and the world.

Congress was eager to go to war in 2001. In fact, East Bay Representative Barbara Lee was the only member of Congress to vote against Joint Resolution 64, the resolution that granted then-President George W. Bush the power to retaliate against anyone the administration believed had helped plan the 9/11 attacks. Congress provided the justification and administrations, both Republican and Democratic, used it for two decades of invasions from Afghanistan and Iraq to Syria, Somalia, the list goes on.

The first marches followed Congress’s vote by just two weeks, at the end of September. Once the invasion began, in October, the protests only continued. By October, also, our government began a crackdown on Muslims in the United States, with illegal roundups and imprisonment in hastily organized “detention centers.” Around the country, demonstrations condemned the racist raids, while government repression legitimized a broad wave of anti-Muslim attacks. People protesting the war in Afghanistan also quickly linked it to US Middle East policy in general, including vigorous US support for Israel’s military offensive in the occupied territories during the second intifada. Beyond the terrible human cost of the war, protesters also pointed out the enormous economic waste the war represented, with the enormous military budget the most recognizable symbol of this bloat.

Ultimately, the protesters were fighting for a world in which war was not the immediate response to a crime like 9/11, in which Afghan children were not acceptable collateral damage in America’s retaliatory campaign. At the protests I attended, banners proclaimed, “Another World Is Possible,” a sentiment that has run like a thread through the anti–Iraq War protests, the Occupy Wall Street movement, and beyond.

A whole generation grew up protesting this war: Some of the children brought to those first marches in their strollers are now young activists in their 20s. These photographs, collected from five photographers who were operating across the country at the time, are evidence that opposing the Afghan war started as soon as the war did. They’re a reminder of that dark time, and a lesson for our future.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x